23. Tests of the DM theory
One should no more rack one's brain about the problem of whether something one cannot know anything about exists all the same, than about the ancient question of how many angels are able to sit on the point of a needle.
— 0. Stern
If we conjecture that our universe operates according to the rules of digital mechanics, then there would be certain consequences that would allow us to verify that fact. It is not clear what would be measurable by means of experiment, but we take the attitude that what is not expressly forbidden is possible. In DM, much of what is thought of as forbidden by relativity or by quantum mechanics is no longer forbidden. This opens the door to new experiments that would give results that would verify the DM conjecture. We do not expect these results to be at odds with either current experimental evidence or with the mathematical formulas of relativity and quantum mechanics. What will undoubtedly be different is the philosophical implications we ascribe to present theories. For example, relativity seems to imply that there is no fixed metric. However, the discovery of a fixed metric would not destroy the mathematical theory of relativity, it would merely change our philosophical perspective. Another example concerns randomness in quantum mechanics. If we were to discover that the apparent randomness was really due to a deterministic hidden variable model, quantum mechanics would not suddenly stop working. DM has in it, at this stage, something for everybody to object to. However, one should be careful to note whether the objection is that DM will be at variance with experimental observation, and the mathematical equations of physics, or with more generalized theories, English, Danish or other natural language explanations, models, heuristics, paradigms or philosophies.
Table 1: Correspondence between digital mechanics and physics.
|
Physics
|
Digital mechanics
|
|
digit-transition
|
D
|
|
length
|
L, the cell to cell distance
|
|
time
|
T , one cycle of the CA clock
|
|
energy
|
D/T, one digit-transition per unit time
|
|
momentum
|
D/L, one digit-transition per unit distance
|
|
mass
|
DT/L2
|
|
angular momentum
|
D
|
|
action
|
D
|
|
Other relationships are:
|
|
charge (+ or -)
|
space-time parity of D, even or odd
|
|
charge quantization
|
stable D orbits in 3-space
|
|
color
|
structure orientation: N-S, E-W, U-D
|
|
2-state system (spin)
|
actually, measuring one bit!
|
|
conservation laws
|
conservation of information
|
|
isotropy
|
asymptotic isotropy
|
|
continuity
|
discreteness
|
|
infinitesimals
|
the digit, units of length and time
|
|
infinities
|
large but finite
|
|
special relativity
|
asymptotic special relativity
|
|
general relativity
|
consequence of the DM process
|
|
measurable acceleration
|
measurable velocity
|
|
measurable rotation
|
measurable angular orientation
|
|
group theory properties
|
consequence of RUCA symmetries
|
|
particle masses
|
stable structures in the RUCA
|
|
too many parameters
|
the rule, and the initial conditions
|
|
why is there anything?
|
answer: unknowable determinism
|
|
complex amplitudes
|
2-phase clock, time dimension depth 2
|
|
spin 1/2
|
smallest D orbit
|
|
isotopic spin
|
projection of D orbits that represent charge
|
|
form of the photon
|
each particle is a digital machine where its spin, momentum, energy charge, color etc. is represented by information or by a particular information process.
|
|
form of the electron
|
|
form of the quark
|
|
form of the gluon
|
|
form of the neutrino
|
